ThinkProof field notes
Short, original notes on evidence, confidence, governance, and human judgment in AI-shaped work.
Test your judgment →Signal 001
A useful answer can still produce a weak decision when ownership, consequences, and missing evidence stay invisible.
The person using AI remains responsible for the move from information to action. That means naming what the answer assumes, what would change the decision, and who carries the consequence if it is wrong.
Ask next: What would make this answer defensible?
Signal 002
Fluent language can make uncertainty feel resolved before anyone has tested it.
The right response is not permanent distrust. It is calibration: confidence should rise only when provenance, sample quality, context, and competing explanations can survive scrutiny.
Ask next: What would make this answer defensible?
Signal 003
A policy is useful only when it changes what someone does at the moment an AI-assisted decision becomes risky.
Good governance makes escalation paths, evidence thresholds, ownership, and stop conditions visible inside the workflow—not buried in a document nobody opens under pressure.
Ask next: What would make this answer defensible?
Put the idea under pressure